The Myth of Romantic Pr0n

I was reading The Damnation Game by Clive Barker and in it there’s a charcter who is obsessed with porn and in listing his collection Clive mentions “romantic” porn.

Curious if such a thing existed I Googled it briefly. As you might expect all I found was normal porn and gay porn labeled “porn for women.” But it got me thinking about why such a thing doesn’t exist, and if not why not?

It’s a hugely complicated issue when I spent a moment on it. Basically it has to do with the real purpose of why society openly tolerates porn in it’s current form now. Porn’s real function is not to satisfy sexual appetite but to exacerbate and shape it.

Porn always has a lot missing. And before you say “well yeah that’s because it’s porn” I say well still there’s a gap that logically should be jumped. In romantic comedies and mainstream movies romance always comes with trials. The men always have to earn the sex (and more importantly the approval and affection) in some way. But humans like the idea of getting something for nothing. There should be media to cater to that fantasy, that reward of affection and approval without saying why, or saying why in some vague and universally applicable way, for example just because the lead is male, which is what some fundamentalist types are often after. A culture where they are accepted by default for being born the way they are, as males.

Seduction for its own sake while tremendously common among actual men and women would also be a theme that should be common if porn was actually about fulfilling a need and not making it worse. Contrary to what the TV would tell you, women do occasionally seduce men for what amounts to altruistic purposes. Women also positively respond to direct questions and requests in this context from time to time, but again that never makes the boob tube because the point of romantic comedies and TV relationships in general is to train men to be obedient workers and to train women to be compliant (to the will of the TV) hall monitors and prison trustees.

The gap is between the earning of the romantic comedy and the sloppy unsatisfying reward of pornography. We all know that sex is the implied reward of fulfilling the masculine end of the gender spectrum’s social contract, but there is more, a romantic, emotional element that has been suppressed along with the rest of the male emotional spectrum. Indeed among a man’s assets when listed in an attempt to display his worth is often explicitly stated in relation to the sex appeal of his wife. “He had a beautiful wife and loving children” or the like.

There should exist in media the reward segment that falls between these positions. Or depictions of the kind of conquests real men and boy fantasize about, even attempt, but rarely if ever accomplish. For me it would be very direct, new girl shows up, events conspire to produce time alone, conversation happens and they go from there, but in the missing media it would be idealized. Love/lust at first sight, only with a normal looking human.

The dialog would ideally be crafted to cater to insecure men. Twisting the situation and the female’s responses such that common “mistakes” become advantages. Failure morphed into success.

Instant girlfriend, not just sloppy sex with cookie cutter script and ugly french fingernails. And don’t talk to me about soft core porn because that’s just models or over the top crappy “skinemax” type movies.

There are things that come close of course. Red shoe diaries, a small (official?) part of the Emmanuelle series, the Story of O, Secretary and some hentai. Also in my opinion, Dream On, and in some ways, Californication. But I’m thinking romantic porn should be a full fledged subtype. And these examples always struggle to justify the acceptance, or to gloss over its absence with some sort of distraction. Story of O for instance we’re never told really why O has such fanatical devotion for her man but he’s depicted as handsome and painfully rich and if that’s not distracting enough we have the entire BDSM element to shock us away from thinking about it.

A video simulation of all the positive aspects of having a girlfriend should be a sizable market. A video that makes lonely guys feel not just indulged, but wanted, successful, as people. Depictions of worlds where they are fulfilled and enjoyed, worlds where the guy not capable of being the hero, ugly or not, nerd or solidergod, “finds someone”.

If nothing else it surprises me that there aren’t male chauvinist themed porno films. Like, over the top 1950s good house keeping meets Jenna Jamison. Now I don’t mean the 5 seconds of back story on some porn movies, I mean like selling a whole world to the viewer populated with fantasies. Just look at how everyone is reacting to Madmen. You can’t tell me that’s not 90% attributable to a depiction of a world full of sexy ladies content to be “the little woman”.

I think the reason romantic porn of these types, media that fills the gap, doesn’t exist is precisely because it could exist so easily. I think that gap is there so that men are induced to seek it in real life “no matter the cost” as per their television and sexual stereotype instructions. Given some men’s reaction to sex dolls and hentai, I think it’s clear that an extensive romantic porno collection could provide some men with everything they need, perhaps a substantially larger portion of men then the current social picture of a artificially satisfied man, the loner pervo image, would suggest, or is comfortable with. In much the same way that a good horror movie collection plus video games is more than adequate to the task of satisfying our more violent impulses.

There is also the fact that porn of this type would require actresses capable of selling the impression that they strongly like the lead male without having any idea why. Seeing that done without having some excuse to “justify” that emotion could seriously damage some people’s world view.

Showing an actress perfectly mimicking how your girlfriend or wife actually treats you when you’re home alone and happy could make you a little paranoid. And in a society with an economy based on monogamy and sexy female approval/permission as the end all be all achievement, that could cause some SERIOUS problems.

I think that’s exactly what they don’t want. And the rest of my blog explains why.

Toy Wisdom and Lego Wars

As a kid I spent a lot of time on my own. Introverted by nature, only child, physically hindered, etc.

Like any other boy with loving middle class parents I had toys. I preferred figures and Lego.

I did the same thing with both of them.

Being a male product of The Company training program, or at least enrolled in it as all children were forced to be in my day, competition was the order of the day.

My figures fought wars. From ninja turtles to GI Joes my figure box was backstage to an epic arena of hand to hand combat.

The cliche bashing of figures together with crude explosion sound effects was not to be found at least not if one looked closely.

I preferred figures with points of articulation or “joints” as I called them. How many joints a figure had was in large part a measure of its quality when choosing new figures.

In my day 10 POA on anything other than a GI Joe was like a faceted jewel. Today that’s easy to find and beat.

Transformers were different, they had many POA but they didn’t always move in useful directions, or have sufficient range of motion. Prior to the ball and socket revolution it was a rare transformer that could perform an axe kick.

Now of course throughout this time I had Lego. The urge is strong to call them Legos, as I did when I was a kid, which is a tautology apparently since Lego is the plural already. Old habits die hard.

Anyway, I always had Lego and my collection was always growing. Big family, generous parents.

Over time I grew frustrated with my figures and other monoform toys. My imagination was growing. And the scale of hand to hand combat was starting to feel like a constraint.

My mind was beginning a life long push towards the large scale. I began to prefer characters that could fly. I had discovered evolution in a way. It seemed silly to have a figure with rocket feet or something fight an earth bound figure like Donatello. Seemed unfair and pointless.

I had seen aliens, and real genius, and I was aware of snipers. So I figured flight plus rifle equals no more hand to hand. Sure I could deus ex machina my way around it, but in doing that I felt like I was cheating, and I felt like I wasn’t being realistic with the characters.

Like would Donatello just stand there and let himself be sniped from 50 feet up? Of course not, but he’s not the type to pick up a rifle and fire back either, but… He would build something to solve the problem.

I have no specific memory of this but I suspect my Lego system had its infancy in being equipment for figures. I do recall building rifles, and then gun emplacements, figure sized. Then I tried to build exoskeletons, but my Lego collection didn’t have sufficient parts/skill to really pull that off.

This triggered an arms race. Soon both figures had Lego weapons. And I found that those fights were far more satisfying. For one they were equal scale. (GI Joe vs Mutant Turtle seemed silly.) And though I didn’t think of it consciously they were more perfect because they were polyform. This is probably where my life long fetish for options, consolidation, and multitasking began.

Plus by this time I had turned into a SciFi space geek. Star trek had introduced me to artificial life and space ships.

As such the Lego weapon systems evolved into autonomous weapon systems. As I explained before flight was a serious advantage so it didn’t take long for rockets to find their way to the bottom of gun emplacements.

But then I encountered the same feeling of cheating. I mean just adding rockets seemed silly. Why retro fit a gun when you can purpose build a drone? then the fights became hopelessly mismatched, which ever was most recent won because it had been purpose built to destroy the other.

The seeds of my “Lego Wars” system were in place.

I had a large but limited collection of Lego. Only certain pieces seemed like weapon system pieces, and they were in short supply.

The newer creations had less parts to choose from and I started to cannibalize older models for parts. This exacerbated the feeling of unfairness. If I could just decide to destroy a model for parts the whole idea of them fighting was pointless. (This taught me the economic basis for all conflict, and planted the seeds of my understanding of disruptive technology.)

So I figured I’d have the ships fight for parts in addition to whatever arbitrary goal their stories demanded. It quickly evolved into something akin to Total Annihilation, (which I absolutely adored because it looked like little Lego robots anyway) People vs machines.

Then I injected a real world economic demand into the game world war. Those weapons were rare and coveted. But again, inequity, pointlessness, old enemies I now know well.

I always knew who would win and it was always who I wanted to win. The solution? Dice.

And so I invented Lego Wars. ( http://underlore.com/TBA/?p=771 )

Lego Wars

A developing system by which Lego models can fight fairly.

Originally made by me years and years ago, I’ve recently started redeveloping it. This post is where I’m going to try and document what I have so far.

Basic idea.
———–

A flexible system that allows one to pit Lego models against each other and not reliably know the outcome in advance barring significant mismatch.

It is not intended to be an exhaustive system by default. It began as a simple damage and hit-points combination and in spirit it should always be reducible to that. It was made by a kid and it should be for kids.

But as I played with it and aged the system expanded. I thought of this as technology and strategy development, things which happen during the course of wars.

Weapons
———-

Pictures may eventually be included here. As explained in Toy Wisdom star trek was a big reason this system exists, and so the first weapon I made was a “Phaser Node” it is a round 1×1 flat transparent, it is the simplest weapon and is color coded. Later I experimented with special functions. Red for cutting, Blue for freezing/EMP, Green for rapid fire/multi targeting. This may be developed more.

I renamed them Emitters after the color system developed because I never saw phasers in colors other than orange.

From this modular weapon idea other pieces were designated as weapon system, this idea was later expanded to movement, defensive, control, and special systems.

Weapon systems

Designation: Name of piece in game universe.
Piece: Description of piece used.
Type: Form that damage takes.
Function: Effect in game system.
Notes: Miscellaneous points of interest.
Special: Functions or mechanics unique to a given piece.

Designation:
Piece:
Type:
Function:
Notes:
Special:

Designation: Emitter
Piece: round transparent 1×1 flat
Type: Energy
Function: 1d6 damage plus special effect by color.
Notes: Base chance of special effect 10% per unit.
Special: Pyramid. Damage multiplied by number of posts routed to unit, also special effect percent bonus applied one per post routed.

Designation: Gun
Piece: 2×1 flat with two bars extending 1x horizontally and slightly down
Type: Projectile
Function: 1d4 damage
Notes: Penetrates shields.
Special: Independent System, does not require power.

Designation: Cannon
Piece: Any exposed technic connector wheel post
Type: Projectile
Function: 1d10 damage
Notes: Unstable.
Special: Each round in which any cannon is fired carries 10% (a roll of 1) risk of shutting down all cannons and dealing 1d10 damage per cannon to attached unit.

Defensive Systems

Designation: Plate Shield Generator.
Piece: Flat 2×1, no posts, slotted.
Type: Energy Shield
Function: Adds 5 hit points of shielding.
Notes:
Special: Independent System.

Designation: Shield Generator
Piece: 2×1 flat with large lengthwise cylinder extending from side.
Type: Energy Shield
Function: Adds 50 hit points of shielding.
Notes:
Special:

Censored at Stumbleupon

Final update!

Innomen’s banned from stumbleupon 🙂

Here is a copy of the email between me and Barry Conway, some yuppy stumble minion.

Hello Brandon.

We write to advise you that your StumbleUpon account – Innomen – has been suspended for a further breach of our Terms of Service.

Your account has previously been involved in a number of incidents which breached of Terms of Service, and has been the subject of a high volume of complaints from other members of StumbleUpon. On the last such occasion, we advised you – in writing – as follows:

As we advised in our previous mail, Brandon: Since your account has
now been repeatedly involved in matters of dispute in which
we have been required to intervene, you are formally advised that any
further breach of our Terms will result in the permanent suspension of
your account.

Since you have continued to write objectionable content on your Innomen account, culminating in a recent review on the StumbleUpon blog pages, we have now permanently suspended your account – Innomen.

Please be reminded that our Terms of Service allow for only one account per member, and that you should not create further accounts on our service. Should you do so, they too will be suspended.

This suspension will not be lifted, and – because you have been formally warned on previous occasions – is not subject to appeal. No further correspondence will be entered into on this matter.

A record of your account suspension will be kept on file, along with those relating to the previous incidents.

Sincerely.

Barry Conway (StumbleUpon Community Support)
barry+feedback@stumbleupon.com
http://www.stumbleupon.com

To which I replied…

Oh please. Are you actually so far gone that you believe any of that? No one contacted you. No one complained. I was a valuable member of the su community getting around one fan or more per day. I had 720 followers at the time of my ban. I had regular fruitful correspondence with many members and not one negative private message in over a year.

The only thing I’ve done to get myself banned is fail to kiss developer ass that’s why I’m being banned at 4 in the freaking morning. You’re having a tantrum. You people spammed me your stupid tea party and I wrote my opinion. And it hit a little too close to home.

You don’t want people reading it and so you banned me, plain and simple. You realize how legitimate you’ve made my work right? One is define by the strength of their enemies and I was just unjustly censored by what, the second largest social media site on the Internet?

And for what? Complaints you don’t intend to produce? Heh, I couldn’t have scripted a better exit.

Your rubber stamp TOS gives you the rights to do whatever you want with your ball, yet you feel the need to pretend some kind of due process where no is required or exists.

You may of course take it home with all the maturity of a wounded grade schooler. I’m content with the obvious moral high ground and now the total freedom to publicize this event. Though of course I’m well aware no one will care and those that do, you will ban. Still, it is a thrilling vindication.

I wouldn’t write back if I were you. It will only make you look worse. And your responses absolutely will be published, consider your reply consent to my terms of service 🙂

And thus ends my time as a stumbler. I am a little angry I suppose but really I’m more flattered than anything else. Honestly this is completely unjustified. I’ve been shut out of places before but never so unilaterally. I wonder how long it will take my fans to realize I’m gone, I know from experience that when a person is banned you can go right on sending them stumbles and it won’t notify you that they aren’t going anywhere.

I wonder if the stumbler I had in the cue to be sent will still be sent. Eh, no big deal. The community will live without me. My stumble upon died before they bent over to eBay’s dollar.

Time to fire up my reddit account or something lol.

It’s been a helluva ride.

———
As if their piece of shit service weren’t bloating and fucked up and broken enough, now they insist on putting my sticky post even at the top of direct comment links. So I can’t share comments without forcing my reader to scroll down through something they obviously have already read, so I’m replacing it with a link to here that was they don’t have to scroll down so far.
———

Update: To whom it may concern, I can be found here.

myspace.com/brandonsergent [myspace.com]

friendfeed.com/innomen [friendfeed.com]

Where to begin?

Ruled by silly little brats with porn and poetry.

Unconstitutional EULA restrictions.

Inability to introduce a page unless you claim to like it, despite how much people enjoy complaining.

Inability to respond to reviews.

Removal of classic layout.

Inability to archive or backup your blog.

Absurdly small character limits, and dimension limits for images.

Tactical patenting lock down of a profoundly important type of information system.

Update: I was recently told that there are many like me here and that I need to continue writing reviews because they serve a purpose.

I want to explain something because they served a personal purpose as well.

I truly felt free to say whatever was on my mind here. I no longer feel that way.

I feel like a fool for having dedicated so many hours in creating content and introducing so many people.

Literally my entire circle of friends in real life I brought to stumble.

People I don’t even know anymore in real life still regularly use stumble because of me, people I’ve only met once I’ve hooked before they went their way.

And now I regret each and every one.

The ability to randomly serve up the Internet according to human filters is profoundly important, and I helped a company that would see that ability packaged and sold.

These people would charge per line read if they had had the chance to patent reading.

This event reminded me that free speech does not exist, there are merely levels of restriction.

In short my heart just isn’t in it anymore.

If I were to create content for these people again it would be a shallow imitation of what I would actually like to say, because what I really want to say I have been Specifically Forbidden to say.

I might ‘offend’ someone.

In addition, this event was a solid vindication, a complete ‘I told you so’, a total cynical non-shock that confirms every assertion I’ve ever made about the social circles here.

I have said who rules here, I have said how, I have pointed out the total lack of ethics, and the motivation for their abandonment.

I have called out bigots and liars, ageists and hypocrites. But when I dared to demand transparency and integrity, then we see the true nature of things here.

When I asked pointed specific questions, and when I attempted to defend myself I got silence and threats.

It became clear that all my freedom was merely the result of not yet encountering what the mafia charmingly refers to as a rat, and what is known as a tattletale on playgrounds all over the country.

When it became clear that these people feel that they OWN my thoughts and opinions, when it came down to a hostage situation, change what you say or we’ll silence you completely, I lost all respect.

In a country where protection of the law is a direct function of how much you can afford to pay a lawyer, I can no longer afford to be an idealist.

I cannot risk the deletion of what I have already said. We exist at the mercy of a hydraulic despot, with water in this case being the only realistic way for a non media company to talk to potentially thousands of people who weren’t actively seeking their words.

Too often we trivialize, not realizing that information is the most important commodity on the planet, and people like this control the flow of it.

It may be just a blog to you, and if you saturate it with lyrics and porn, that’s all it will ever be, but to me it was the ears of the future, and to protect what I have already said, I shall say no more.

What I’m doing now: http://underlore.com/TBA/?p=1460

Open letter to Lepht Anonym

http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/enhanced/scrapheap-transhumanism

Have you ever considered running electrodes into your own brain? Like to say stimulate sensations of well being or other custom sensations?

What do you think would be involved? Is this something that could be done outside of a lab?

Ancient peoples survived trepanation, and the brain itself feels no pain, it seems to me the major problem would be placement and blood vessel avoidance.

I have a dream of being able to enter a lucid dream state, mechanically. I think this could be achieved by running a lead to the area of the brain responsible for spacial or social orientation and stimulating it when I enter rem sleep, so that when I’m in a dream state my awareness of my location is enhanced, so that I would pick up on where I am and what I was doing and hopefully realize I’m dreaming.

In any case I’ve always said that the extreme body mod crowd are budding transhumanists. You are the first to make that claim a reality.

By existing you prove my point.

I appreciate that.

Keep up the good work.

AIDS

Let me start out my post with one question for AIDS denialists, or dissidents, whatever they prefer to be called. If HIV does not cause AIDS are any of you willing to be injected with HIV under any circumstances?

If HIV is harmless as they claim, are they willing to put that claim to the ultimate test?

The answer, I’m willing to bet, is going to be a universal evasion.

I must admit to having had doubts on the issue of AIDS. Among the elements involved are greed and power. The core of the dissident argument rests on the question of would governments conspire with corporations to kill undesirables, blame social problems on promiscuity and drug use, and otherwise execute babies for power and profit, if they could get away with it.

I think we all know that the answer is a sobering and overwhelming yes.

The relevant question however is not are they willing or even able, but simply, are they. I don’t think they are. I think they ignore the problem or otherwise exacerbate it, I wouldn’t even be shocked if evidence appeared which showed that they spread it, or even in a nightmarish extreme created it, but I don’t think it’s a myth.

Is the HIV AIDS link a hoax? For a time I believed it very well could have been. And why is that shocking? I don’t trust doctors because they are rich status quo people from my perspective. I don’t trust the pharmaceutical industry. I don’t trust my government. I remember reading that there isn’t a solid black and white test for AIDS, that it’s actually a combination of things, and that the criteria for having HIV/AIDS varied from country to country. Does that not raise questions? And on the backdrop of such a profound and justified absence of trust, is it really so shocking that a great many otherwise intelligent people would come to the conclusion that it all might be a lie designed to wipe out undesirables?

We have to take scientists on faith and when a simple look at the politics of science reveals that what they say can sometimes, especially in highly politicized arenas, be predicted by who provides funding, that faith is sometimes hard to come by. After all, doctors went on TV telling us how certain brand of cigarettes were good for you.

However. Logic must not be ignored. In the case of AIDS the faith issue can be side stepped entirely because of the simple fact is when you treat an AIDS patient with AIDS drugs, they get better, when you take them off them they get sick. That closes the debate. When you couple that with the question asked at the beginning of this post, faith stopped being an issue.

The matter now becomes one of public health and money.

I recommend development of chemical synthesis technologies that revolutionize how drug are manufactured. This is an approach I recommend for most problems. Exit, and circumvention. Genetically altered plants, or synthetic bacteria for mass production of drugs is an option that I think will really change things.

Brazil got lower prices on antivirals at one point because they had labs to make their own drugs. The drug companies knew that Brazil may very well say fuck your laws I’ll make my own then you’re up shit creek.

That is the only way to win. Disruptive technologies. Force those who can, to do, and if that fails, enable yourself.

AIDS and sickness generally is an issue of national and global security. We need to start acting like it.

The virus is our enemy. Our ignorance of it is it’s chief weapon.

Poverty is not a capitol crime. Science is our best weapon.