Conspiracy Video Review: Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined Full

The whole premise of the thing is the phrase “new world order” as if its a proper noun with a specific meaning. I have never liked that usage because it’s unfair. It’s impossible to cite.

The video pretty much opens with a bunch of politicians and aging fops talking about “a new world order” as if I’m supposed to be shocked.

I could do the same thing with a phrase like “a brighter tomorrow.” So keep that in mind.

However, it is capitalized in some of the offered documentation, and since all these people live in the same tiny social circle they clearly do mean it the same way. That is interesting, but regardless of whether or not some people mean it as a conspiracy tag, many others probably do not. In a way if it IS a conspiracy that’s a genius name for it, since in and of itself it’s plausibly deniable.

Also I don’t like Alex Jones, and his insanity. He needs to keep his mouth shut about his satanic ritual crap. He’s a zealot nutbar, despite being right about a great many things. And he has no idea how to actually change things, probably because he’s actually scared shitless of change (as are all fundamentalists)

0:28:49

Oh Jesus, it’s Alex. I wonder if he’s going to tell me about the evil gays. *facepalm* Oh really jackass? is that what I’m watching? Thanks for telling me. How about you plug something for us? Yea, that’s better, thanks. He seriously doesn’t realize he helps “the globalists” every time he opens his mouth because he discredits everything he talks about by being him and talking about it. Or hell, maybe he does. After all, no one’s killed him.

Back to the show. Later on at 0:37:53 we hear “Global Governance” This term is much better because it says something about intent. New World Order can literally mean anything so long as it’s new, applies everywhere, and has structure. What they are talking about is a bunch of people who though means subtle and gross have for whatever reason de facto control of society. Fine. Not at all shocking.

If you want to attack that, publicity and dvds are not the way to go. You have to attack the roots of their power.

The conspiracy people seem to think that its like… a bunch of people join a council, are given power, and then design wars. It’s the other way around. These people are a consequence of the system. They are a natural outgrowth of capitalism and the centralization that is required for our survival. You could shoot every one of them in the head right now and in 6 months you’d have replacements for all of them.

Our current world structure demands the existence of top down management because we have massive centralized systems. The conspiracy people don’t seem to realize that. They think the way things are is because these people exist when really these people exist because of the way things are.

If you want to change things, get behind a disruptive technology. (http://underlore.com/TBA/?p=663)

0:39:37

He’s right about dictatorships and the question he should be asking is why. He should look at these nations, where they have a new leader every 3 years because someone shot the old ones, and ask why time and again do dictators happen? Because, that is the most efficient way to solve the problems of state. Let me share with you something from SciFi that will convey what I mean. Bear with me here.

Data, Speaking about The Borg: “The technology required to achieve this biological and artificial interface is far beyond our capabilities. There are many advantages.” Riker: Speed being the obvious one. This ship literally thinks what it wants to do and it happens.”

This idea is the crux of why monarchy comes about time and again and why dictators rule in a simple setting. A group, by definition, can not act as quickly as an individual and there are two fundamental truths about reality that make that important. 1. No decision is usually worse than a bad decision. 2. Speed is more important than strength.

My core point on this subject is this. A king, given the current set of our technological abilities is a good idea, and killing the king will only give you a new king. There will always be people of influence. You can’t legislate morality. You have to have something to replace it with, else you get a power vacuum and that causes genocide. Just telling people to wake up accomplishes nothing. We’re not as stupid as you think. We see whats going on, but you’re providing no alternative of any kind, much less a viable one.

These Alex Jones types have no idea what to do with the world. They are full of flowery rhetoric and they are clearly to a man wholly ignorant of game theory. They are the intellectual equivalent of the Amish. And since they have nothing to offer and no idea how to strategically orient themselves for a true and lasting victory they are where they are, selling dvds.

Seriously. What do these people expect the powerful to do? Encourage dissent and lack of communication? What is the best way to wipe out an enemy? Shoot them or make them an ally? By definition, the most supreme form of diplomacy, merger, is a loathsome act to these people. They apparently Want to live in the shadow of war… Permanently.

Shock and surprise! People with enough power to actually change things actually trying to change things for their benefit. By definition that’s a conspiracy yes, but then again so is a school of fish. It’s cellular automata. It’s rational decisions made by the thousands leading to a trend.

They want to prevent war and prevent revolt. We need government to manage our central systems to keep us alive because without central management we get insoluble common good problems. That’s a fact. That MUST be changed (the only way it will is disruptive technology) before we can get rid of the state, and the desire for a half assed patch work system of states (National sovereignty and states rights) is just a check list for permanent war.

I’ll give a flying fuck about national sovereignty and states rights when I can be a nation or a state. As it stands it’s a choice of who owns me, and if I have to make a choice I’ll go with the one least likely to get me starved or shot. These pampered yuppie theorists have no idea what’s going on or what would happen if even a 5th of their lunatic wishes were granted.

And I’m sick and tired of fear mongering and spin being used to sell dvds. Loose change was epic journalism. This is a bigoted Luddite church commercial.

0:43:52

Yes because people are stupid. They don’t think about the long term. Hell, they buy bottled water for fucks sake. You have to “Frog’m” as my dad puts it. You have to do it slowly. Good or bad. And if you assume that nations will ALWAYS exist the centralizing effort is the only rational answer. War MUST be made obsolete. Basically everyone is bitching about the price of peace. Easy to do when it’s not your toddler that blew off his hands thinking the bomblet was a toy.

These fake wars are there to extract money from YOU and keep YOU out of the way because you’re a meddlesome moron that asks the sky fairy for protection while beating your children and ranting about the NWO. If you people weren’t so stupid and breeding like roaches maybe the people who manage to run everything would level with us. But if we were that smart we’d not have let them get there in the first place. Ultimately, we’re just jealous.

We all want to be safe, and being powerful helps.

The thing is, nations ARENT always going to exist. But these theorists actually want them too. Don’t you get it guys? You’re demanding the permanence of the very conditions that gave birth to these people you so hate.

You’re CREATING the conditions in which they thrive.

0:47:37

Uhh, yes it is a systemic reaction. That’s just you being ignorant of life and the interaction between humans and reality.

How did they GET powerful? Why only powerful people? How many were powerful BEFORE they joined these groups? These are important questions. Sure people are born into money and power but as far as the CFR and the like these people had money and influence or their families did before the groups existed. That’s an important point.

It’s like the mafia. Everyone wants to be a gangster so they can kill people, but it’s the other way around, the mafia takes you in because you kill people.

They ARE trying to be secret. And YOU’RE why! You CLEARLY don’t understand, generally. You want oversight, but at some point oversight will kill us all.

The reason these people have to try and stay underground is because people by and large don’t understand statecraft enough to realize that shooting the king is a shit idea. You people would muddle the process so badly with ignorance that nothing would ever get done. (Congress) You conspiracy people wouldn’t tolerate them being rulers in the open! When rulers by virtue of the current state of humanity and technology, are exactly what we require. Again, Look at Congress. Would you REALLY want THEM in actual charge? Sure you can say the CFR types elect them. But did they put a gun to your head? We could write in and get whoever we want as president. Do we? No, because we can’t be bothered. And if we were EVER going to be bothered it would have happened by now.

People complain about congress being a sham, well thank fucking god! They’re a bunch of religious psychos, liars, and coke heads… and we elect them! We’d all be radioactive glass by now if they were actually in charge.

Name your state’s representatives and senator. Yea I thought not. (me either, don’t feel bad) You know why? Because ultimately people don’t want to be bothered with power. They want the perks and none of the sleepless nights.

The problems that are blamed on the elite are really manifestations of systemic issues with our reliance on centralized structures. I say reliance because the alternative is death. (currently) The materials economy, belief in the efficacy of punishment and reward, the concept of property, etc. These have consequences. And while the most noteworthy is us being alive, not all are good. The only possible solution to an absolute common good problem is coercion or deception of the individuals in question. I’m sorry if that sucks but that’s how logic is built here. Blaming these power mongering psychopaths is missing the point. Sure they are assholes, but you have to understand the soil from which these weeds spring.

A lawn mower isn’t a solution it’s a stopgap. Alex Jones and his ilk fear the level of change required. Hell most of them still rely on a personal sentient god for sufficient comfort to live. Sky Santa for the win. (I’m a deist btw.)

We have been manipulated on a mass scale, but we demand it. We’re unwilling to share. We’re slaves to our animal nature. We fear change unless we’re SURE it benefits us and one can never be sure of anything. In short, we are afflicted with the human condition.

“Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you.” ~Ghost In The Shell

The simple fact is there is too much information for a single unaltered human mind to contain, let alone process. The beginning of wisdom is the statement “I don’t know.” That’s why we have specialists. People to focus. Leadership is a focus like any other.

In olden times the logistics of democracy were limited by location, we couldn’t go to the capitol and tend our land, so we elected leaders. (or tolerated leaders who took power) Now its an issue of information. What happens when leadership requirements grow beyond human capacity? What happens when the decisions needed are so complex that no person could cast a rational vote?

“That’s the problem with you people. You can’t think but five minutes in front of your face.” ~Matrix Revolutions

What happens when I tell you your jealousy, your inability to share a mate, is the Root tool used to control you? Then, well, even the foil hats say I’m nuts. You people create by your lifestyle choices the mire from which these monsters spring.

What the conspiracy theorists paint as dynasties of evil spring DIRECTLY from the notions of reward and punishment that they clearly believe in and the notions of property rights they clearly cherish.

1:09:52

Oh god here we go, paperclip. *facepalm*

http://underlore.com/TBA/?p=1383 That gets addressed here as well.

See? Clearly a function of ignorance. Why is it the very same people that scoff at McCarthyism’s childish, obsessive, fear of communism fail to understand that “Nazi” just means national socialist and that the majority of them didn’t give a flying fuck about the Jews and pointedly were not frothing insane evil monsters, instead focusing on personal well being like the rest of us.

How many people have cars killed? Did they not know cars would potentially kill people when they made them? Did they not make them anyway? not that car makers are nazis just that mass death is disregarded by apparently non-evil people. So what makes the Nazis evil? Torture? Murder? Bigotry? Sadism? Hardly unique stuff.

This notion that being a nazi makes you evil really needs to be challenged in this context when one considers that ALL of Germany became nazi when Hitler came to power. Many of these people are no more nazi in the contemporary way than I am a democrat because a democrat is in office.

And even if they were evil frothing Nazis so what? They were also national assets and human weapons. If you’re so for national sovereignty then you have to be behind us having the weapons and not the soviets. Or anyone else. If letting one nazi live unpunished (as if punishment has value) saved the lives of 10 million Americans or more by keeping a cold war cold, then I’m behind that call and I’m not sorry about it.

That’s the kind of decision you don’t want to make, so you ignore your congressmen. That’s also why I’m not running for anything.

Whole global warming thing:

http://underlore.com/TBA/?p=242

1:54:37

Oh here we go, chip fear. Man they really are touching on all the foily bases aren’t they.

http://underlore.com/TBA/?p=1369 for why that’s a bunch of crap.

It’s a technology folks. Used properly its no worse than a diabetic wrist band. And if it’s used improperly you can just cut it out.

1:57:31

Cute baby. Way to play the kid card. But you assholes already drop them in the social meat grinder of public education. Quit acting like you give a shit sufficient to change things. You talk a big game about sovereignty but lets talk about kids. You willing to let them have an adulthood test as opposed to an arbitrary chronological standard? Of course not, then they might be able to tell you you’re full of shit and you won’t be able to hit them for it.

http://underlore.com/TBA/?p=993 Interesting comments here about the kid card.

1:58:23

lmao I knew it, I should have predicted it, Alex Jones after all. He’s always gotta throw in his psycho Satan Illuminati pagan insanity. Probably conditional on him producing it. Alex: “I’ll sign on but you’ve gotta throw in some pagan occult, and gay bashing. No discussion.”

Skull and bones is populated with occultists about as much as Phi Kappa Kappa is peopled with Greek philosophers.

I suppose if you count homo-erotic hazing, pathetic live action role play, and cocaine use as esoteric occult ritual then yeah, it’s occult.

2:01:21

PAGN RITCHULS! GIT THA PITCHFERKS FELLAHS YEE HAWWW!

Seriously? On noes! Scary pagans!

It’s better than your boring ass churches and fat sweaty monster “speaking in tongues.” Show tunes aren’t my thing, but The Master and Margarita is one hell of a book. (pun intended)

2:02:13

Ignore the pain of others you say? Sounds pretty honest to me if you have ambition. Again, what about children? What about the concepts of punishment and reward? You people are shitting in the living room and then blaming the neighbors about the smell.

2:02:52

The reason the elite are linked with the occult is fairly simple. You just have the be a student of history and the mind. It boils down to the psychological power of habit and ritual, as Anton LaVey can explain in depth, and to the invention of banking, the Templars, and the church’s debt.

Look up why Friday the 13th (like the post date on this article? Maybe it’s a conspiracy!) is bad luck. The Templars invented the “chit” and later became the Masons. (Born in Blood is a great book.)

2:04:01

Let’s just round out this farce. Bring on the Gay bashing YAY! *Face Palm*

And that’s it. We’re done.

All that being said the objective statements made as far as I know are on the level.

It’s also entertaining as well as informative, barring the constant beg for money and occasional hyperbole. The old man interviewed clearly knows his stuff. His words alone make this worth watching.

And this does serve as a moderately useful “holy shit” moment for all those people too attention deprived to read a People’s History of the United States by Howard Zinn.

Tear down of the first hour of “In Lies We Trust.”

This video was sent to me twice, once by my dad and once by an online friend.

I figured it was time for a review/response.

I’m going to forgo the expected attack on the man personally. I don’t care if he’s a child raping schizophrenic alien for the purposes of this essay. His claims and approach will be examined at face value.

Ironically his first claim is about himself. So I guess his background is unavoidably involved.

Wiki tells me he’s a former dentist, and an AIDS conspiracy theorist. He believes AIDS was invented by the government. It doesn’t mention the PHDs he claims. But whatever. I don’t care if he’s got a Nobel, that wouldn’t make him right or wrong.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Leonard_Horowitz

And yes I use wiki as my primary source here, if you’re going to take this dude’s word for it, you should trust wiki just as much.

Could we dispense with the music? Please? The presence of music indicates an attempt to manipulate my emotions. Not a good start.

We get the question, if we’re advancing technologically why is quality of life not being improved?

It may merely be the result of the population expanding faster than the technology. It may also be that like a frog in a slow boil, we’ve just grown accustomed to what we have.

Once he starts talking about the video “History of bioterrorism” we start to see some of the problems I have with this video. He just name drops the CIA. “This program.. Was co-produced with the department of homeland security, with the CIA’s involvement.”

Oh yeah? What kind of involvement? Check this out. I wrote this essay “with the CIA’s involvement.” How? I went to the CIA’s webpage and looked up the first word. Depending on how you define “first” it’s probably “DOCTYPE” or “Mission”, or maybe, “About.” Does this mean I’m working for the CIA now? Are they “involved” in my website? No.

He’s clearly trying to imply some ominous connection, but he fails to show it. This is a common theme in this video. Lots of implication, no documentation. Indeed precious little explanation.

However, his use of the film as a representation of the government’s position, is a valid one. The CDC for example has a page sharing this video as fact. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/training/historyofbt/

Moving on…

He then spends a lot of time talking about how important and controversial this video is. I don’t like being explicitly told how I’m supposed to feel. Especially in the context of a film that’s supposed to provide me with the data I need to make informed decisions.

Then we get a cartoon from the 50s of a turtle talking about duck and cover. He then vaguely explains some link between “duck and cover” and industry. Again, just what link? What’s your point man?

The whole concept of duck and cover is not and was never meant to imply that hiding under a desk will make you nuke proof. It’s simply about preventing panic, and making yourself a smaller target for debris. Hitting the deck IS a good idea around an explosion. It’s just that with nukes we actually have the potential for a time lag between the light of the blast and the shock wave.

Duck and cover is not famous because it’s a bad idea, its famous because it shows how paranoid we were about nuclear war.

He then explicitly links the government’s current position with duck and cover. Oh I wish. Duck and cover at least is harmless.

And now the hate begins. We get name calling and hyperbole. Not very documentary there Leo. Yes yes tell us more about how awful they are and how they are lying.

Oh boy! A full screen definition of genocide with elevator music! Gee thanks Leo I had no idea what genocide meant… But wait a minute, that’s not the definition of genocide. Genocide does not relate to slavery or profit. It relates to killing. And the fact that his definition is in quotes and yet fails to state what he’s quoting is pretty well the theme of this video.

The video then asks could this be happening in America? Well sure, someone could be killing all the protestants in Nebraska right now, how do I know? The question is invalid and sneaky. I agree we are enslaved, but again, that’s not genocide. And to misuse the word is intellectually dishonest and in unbelievably poor taste considering that genocide actually happens.

The man also doesn’t know what propaganda means, considering that’s exactly what this video is by definition.

He then talks about “real villains” and his definition is jam packed with negative subjective terms. He’s in effect defining terms with synonyms almost exclusively.

You know I’m just going to stop commenting on all the horrific video editing work. This video is awful, I’ll leave it at that.

I really wish he’d stop asking loaded questions. Could this could that. Well yes if the event in question is permitted by the laws of physics then yes, they could. But is that the case? Implication is not enough Leo. Make a positive statement.

Finally! Something I can look up. “The Report from Iron Mountain.” Shitty for Leo, this book is apparently just a satire. Does it contain truth? Probably. Most good satire does. But presenting it as unchallenged fact is yet more intellectual dishonesty. If you want to read something that will break your mind regardless of it being real or not merely because it very well could be, check out Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars. (Best version here: http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/sw4qw/)

He talks about “the participants of iron mountain” and then behind him is a graphic with Rockefeller and Kissinger. That’s yet more intellectual slight of hand. Taken as fact the book doesn’t even say who was at the meeting.

Granted the concept of threat fabrication for power purposes is a valid one, but man if you’re going to use tactics like this to sell it, get off my side. Its like Alex Jones and his satanic psychosis, or Jim Marrs and his aliens. He’s quoting something that may very well be a satire as fact. Why not instead raid it for ideas and restate/attack them on their own merit? Why the argument from authority?

If there’s any conspiracy to be revealed here, its that the other team hires fruit-loops to make rational dissenters look bad. A sort of rhetorical agent provocateur.

He’s seriously going to sit there and say NASA and public welfare programs are a substitute for war spending? Oh my god, don’t we all wish.

Here’s a bit about the reality of the situation from http://dailycensored.com/2010/03/30/there-is-a-thing-about-opinions/

about defense spending– True, Social Security and Medicare are about the same size as the amount we are told is spent upon defense. The difference is that Medicare and Social Security are governmental TRUST funds. They are NOT paid for through income tax. They are supported by direct contributions from those who benefit from them. [Except that is for illegal aliens using someone else’s social security number. They pay but do not collect]. Hence, Social Security and Medicare do not belong in the Federal Budget Allocations, whereas Defense spending is an appropriation and is 60+% of our budget.

If our spending was in line with the rest of the world we could easily balance our budget. Just about every country in Europe, for example, spends less that 2% of its GDP on defense. Most are around 1% and the whole European Union together only spends 1.69%. We spend 4.65%. It is this imbalance that makes it easy for the top 1-2% to keep us busy fighting each other, rather than focusing on them, the real cause of the problem.

I guess we can add economics to the list of things this guy is misrepresenting.

That The Company invents bogeymen for power and profit is no shock to anyone. That illness and terrorists generally are such bogeymen, is also not shocking. Is that all you’ve got Leo?

Where are my facts? So far we don’t have one verifiable specific claim. We don’t even have an original statement of trends. Let’s hope you’re going somewhere with all this rhetoric.

Wow, let’s just show a bunch of injuries and genetic and toxic developmental damage with no indication of how they fit into the narrative.

Oh god the eugenics drum gets a beat too. I guess we can add Luddite to the man’s list of accolades. Genetic research is NOT synonymous with eugenics.

Oh man he’s actually including footage of Jim Marrs. Who is a competent historical annalist, but who also thinks lizard aliens are running the show. 🙁 I’m quick to add Rule by Secrecy is an awesome book JAM PACKED with verifiable facts.

Use him but don’t include him man. Use his research, verify it for yourself, and include THAT, don’t make an argument from authority and use a ufo guy as the authority.

Still, the assertion that the de facto governmental form today is akin to socialism with corporations being the real citizens instead of individuals, is tremendously useful and fairly unique. Then linking that to the obvious patriotic element of control and you get Nationalist pride driven corporate Socialism. Like I said, I like Jim and his work, he’s just not the guy you want on your poster, if you know what I mean. (Neither am I I’m quick to add.)

What’s that Jim about the word Nazi? From the wiki… https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Nazi

Nazism (Nationalsozialismus, National Socialism; alternatively spelled Naziism[1])

See Leo? Say something we can check on.

I suspect that this tidbit of information is the best thing about this documentary.

Jim also goes on to talk about “Corporatism” and fascism, and again, his statements are verifiable. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Corporatism#cite_note-doctrine-40

As Jim’s face fades from view I realize I’m going to miss his rationality as I watch the rest of this farce.

Hmm ok NSSM 200. Checking…

Well there is this NSSM 220, a 2 page request for a study.

http://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/library/document/nsdmnssm/nssm220a.htm

NSSM 200 Apparently being the study that was called for…

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/National_Security_Study_Memorandum_200

Yup it exists. But no it does not “call for massive third world depopulation.” what is says is that exploding populations are a threat. Which is VERY different. I grow SO weary of this intellectual slight of hand.

And then we have this crazy blunt non sequitur about the US having biological and nuclear weapons “deployed around the planet.”

I have no doubt that we have biological weapons in secret. But the image behind him of a man sorting bombs, does not contain nuclear or biological weapons. It would be absurd not to have bioweapons however, at least for counter study purposes. Besides the CDC is packed with what could be called bioweapons. You could easily have a purely paper based administrative bioweapons program using immunological data applied to military strategy.

But that’s a far cry from smallpox in every armory, ready to wipe out the third world’s poor, which is the clear implication. Besides this study was don in the 70s, they’re moving a little slow.

And here we have some quotes. Lifted completely out of context. (I’ll bracket what he put on screen.)

19. The political consequences of current population factors in the LDCs – rapid growth, internal migration, high percentages of young people, slow improvement in living standards, urban concentrations, and pressures for foreign migration ── are damaging to the internal stability and international relations of countries in whose advancement the U.S. is interested, thus creating political or even national security problems for the U.S. In a broader sense, there is a major risk of severe damage to world economic, political, and ecological systems and, as these systems begin to fail, to our humanitarian values.

20. The pace of internal migration from countryside to over swollen cities is greatly intensified by rapid population growth. Enormous burdens are placed on LDC governments for public administration, sanitation, education, police, and other services, and {{urban slum dwellers (though apparently not recent migrants) may serve as a volatile, violent force which threatens political stability.}}

He actually changed the beginning of the quote on this one to hide the fact that it’s ripped from context.

22. {{In international relations, population factors are crucial in, and often determinants of, violent conflicts in developing areas.}} Conflicts that are regarded in primarily political terms often have demographic roots. Recognition of these relationships appears crucial to any understanding or prevention of such hostilities.

26. {{There is no single approach which will “solve” the population problem. The complex social and economic factors involved call for a comprehensive strategy}} with both bilateral and multilateral elements. {{At the same time actions and programs must be tailored to specific countries and groups.}} Above all, LDCs themselves must play the most important role to achieve success.

At this point we are flooded with he said she said… First about Walter Isaacson speaking about Kissinger and some shadowy decree to spare all Nazi. When that’s not what paperclip was about at all.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Operation_Paperclip

And yes many industrialists had close ties to the Nazis because hello we weren’t always at war with them. Just because someone sold a gasket to the Nazis by mail doesn’t mean they secretly want to kill Jews.

I hate the rich as much as anyone, read my work, but hate them for valid reasons. There are plenty I assure you without making them up.

Allen Dulles, Paul Manning, Martin Bormann, Herman Schmidtz, Eric Troube, Ann Burger, … Lets drop a few more names and hope no one asks us to explain why they are significant or god forbid how they relate to my core assertion. And to complicate any effort to do so lets for once desist from our obnoxious constant on screen text so no one can get the spelling right, I know I couldn’t, and there is no official transcript of this video anywhere. Where is all that documentation?

Kissinger is a horrific man, no doubt. But still, how does that relate to the core point? NSSM 220 is still not about exterminating people.

“directed secretly, though covert intelligence” If it’s a secret how do you know? Because Operation Paperclip and NSM 200 are declassified? Do you know why? Because they are harmless.

Oh what is this? A clip from outbreak? What in the world does that have to do with anything? Why not one from The Stand as well? Or Home Alone while we’re grabbing random movies.

24:49 And now magically we’re back to The History of Bioterrorism.

“Just two decades after the report from iron mountain was released and it’s policies enacted.”

Heh, “Just?” Really? 20 years is nothing huh 😛 And again it was fiction, no one enacted it as policy for the same reason no one enacted alice in wonderland as policy. 😛

Now that’s not to say elements of it aren’t mirrored IN policy, but again that’s true of any good political satire.

Another non sequitur into the military concept of Revolution in Military Affairs which is basically just a fancy way of saying “update how to wage war in the face of new technology.”

“In this publication from the 1960s.”

Heh, what publication? From where? Who wrote it? Why does it matter?

Now we get into the really sneaky shit.

Let’s fill the screen with text and keep running my mouth, like an old friend told me, if you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.

And, we shall see, the manner in which we use our resources undoubtedly has a great influence on the thinking of millions of people throughout the world. The thoughts and attitudes of these millions are of paramount significance since the mind is one of the most important battlegrounds of the Cold War.

What is he talking about? What’s content? This mystery 1960’s document, or the RMA?

And he’s wrong about the war college also.

From the wiki… https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Revolution_in_Military_Affairs

The original theorizing was done by the Soviet Armed Forces in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly by Marshal Nikolai Ogarkov.[1] The U.S. initially became interested in it through Andrew Marshall, the head of the Office of Net Assessment, a Department of Defense think tank. It slowly gained credence within official military circles, and other nations began exploring similar shifts in organization and technology.

Cancer viruses? Hmmm. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Oncovirus

Again a video non sequitur, of one guy hating his meds. Which no doubt cost way to much and do more harm than good. I stipulate that, but where is the point?

More gene/sci/tech fear. Every time I get sick it’s the government that did it with their fancy plastic suits. Godless bastards. *facepalm*

Quote, unconditioned individuals…

Quote from what? He’s ALWAYS doing that.

And I hate how he can’t even pronounce anything. He actually says “plausible denial-ability” around 28:30 It’s “deniability.” Only one L sound. And the concept applies to everyone. Encryption systems like TrueCrypt employ plausible deniability features.

…experts say…

Wiki has a term for phrases like that. “Weasel words.”

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Weasel_word

The dude actually goes on to make fun of the lady’s name. Yeah that just SCREAMS professionalism. Now I make fun, I’m a huge smart ass, but I wouldn’t do it in my freaking “documentary.” I mean, do I give Leo shit for his TelePrompter and his complexion reminiscent of the new Jersey fake bake epidemic? No, because they aren’t relevant.

The guy once again shows clips from a movie (The Manchurian Candidate remake, good movie though) to refute the CDC doctors… Really? Leo? Really?

However, he does have a point about the hazing process of medical professionals, and how it’s entirely possible to convince even experts of a lie. It’s sort of like a post purchase rationalization.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Post-purchase_rationalization

Oh boy after a bunch of rambling crap we have a new name and a new insult! The “prostitute” Abraham Flexner. This title is ironic considering the damage he did to prostitutes generally, as explained in the article mentioned, which is from 1940 I might add and is clearly and editorial piece as much as anything.

He’s the reason we have John’s Hopkins medical center. I strongly encourage anyone to read the article (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,802061,00.html) and the Wiki about the guy himself. And maybe put “Johns Hopkins” in Google sometime.

I quote from the wiki… https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Abraham_Flexner

After graduating from Johns Hopkins, Flexner returned to Louisville and founded a private school in which to test his ideas about education. He believed that education should be marked by small classes, personal attention, and hands-on teaching. Graduates of his school were soon accepted at leading colleges, and Flexner’s school attracted considerable attention.

He then goes down a laundry list of alternative medicines attacked by the new medical schools. Including “most forms of energy medicine” hehe he means crystals and such in short, quackery and snake oil. I hate the medical establishment as much as the next guy, but this was the 20s. People didn’t know any better. If a guy in a lab coat told them to drink arsenic in the morning to cure stiff knees, people would do it.

(Check out the movie “The Road To Wellville”.) for some idea of the vulnerability I’m trying to get across. It’s not like today where quacks could be crushed by consensus. they were REALLY dangerous back then.

Applying our standards to the 1940s is just insanity.

They were building a monopoly because we needed a centralized approach to medical education because again this is before the Internet. This is like putting up the only lemonade stand in the neighborhood and then immediately being accused of monopoly building. Quarts crystals and acupuncture are not competition for medicine.

The medical industry has huge problems and it drags its feet for profit and stomps on alternatives all the time, granted, but by and large, the old stab still applies most of the time. What stab you ask? “You know what they call alternative medicine that works? Medicine.”

Healthcare became a single entity because the government had to regulate it because people were selling cocaine and mercury as a tooth aid, and the like. In this country you can’t be a doctor without government approval. This isn’t a conspiracy, it’s a license. It’s like saying the government has a monopoly on drivers.

There are issues no question but this presentation of them is flawed and EXTREMELY disingenuous.

This fucker just steeped over the line for me. He has the balls to show a picture of Auschwitz, and then tosses off UNIT 731 as “human rights violations.” Like she was exaggerating. Jesus man if anything she was RADICALLY understating the matter.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Unit_731

This moron actually says that America, in specific reference to Unit 731 with a picture of Shiro Ishii in the background, says we have done “the same or even worse.”

Are You Out Of Your Fucking Mind? Dude, No.

We’ve done horrific shit, no question, but Unit 731 is a God among atrocities. And you clearly have never picked up a book about it. Let me put it this way, most libraries keep the reference material under lock and key to avoid traumatizing people. The Internet has no such scruples. Happy digging, but before you start let just say, some things you can’t unsee.

Are these anglo-American corporations any less criminal than the Japanese military organization Dr. Cono Recalls?

That would be a resounding yes you moron in both substance and legality. 1. Unit 731 was legal according to the Japanese government at the time. But that’s just pedantry. What you meant was a comparison of horrors.

Again, wow. Nothing the pharmaceutical industry has ever done comes close to the mind numbing blinding torture undertaken regularly at Unit 731.

Your insensitivity is matched only by your ignorance.

Oh noes! Her date is off? See above for why you are in no position to complain about someone’s dataset.

He briefly mentions cancer viruses again. And he’s right that people were killed, by a Dr. Cornelius P. Rhoads.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Cornelius_P._Rhoads

But I’m willing to bet viruses were not involved. I would say rather the infection was accomplished by transplantation of cancerous tissue.

Comparing the botched Vioxx painkiller to the Nazi’s medical experiments and Unit 731 is inexcusable and indefensible.

The radical down play of the size of the Bioweapons facility is completely believable but impossible to verify.

Again from the wiki… “SV40 is an abbreviation for Simian vacuolating virus 40 or Simian virus 40, a polyomavirus that is found in both monkeys and humans.”

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/SV40#Theorized_role_in_human_disease

Of course though he’d dismiss this data as propaganda.. convenient.

Why don’t you tell us where we can get he full list of these viruses created by this Special Virus Cancer Program, which I can find no reference to outside the conspiracy media.

And please kill these stupid sound effects.

Heh, oh look NOW he trusts the mainstream science press by quoting nature.

Man this guy clearly has some sexual issues. He loves calling people prostitutes. But like many other words he apparently doesn’t understand the relevant definitions. She’s not sleeping with anyone for money therefor she’s not a prostitute. Case Closed.

(Are you still reading this? Damn, I don’t know why I’m still writing it. I’m only 44 minutes into this 2 hour monster and I’ve been writing for 5 fucking hours.)

Joy, yet more quotes from phantom sources. *sigh*

Oh god, sports metaphors… *facepalm*

Claims claims claims, no defense.

Hmm yeah William C. Patrick III is a liar and the USA bioweapons program continues. Ok. Stipulated. Your point?

Ok, I’m done taking any of this shit seriously. And I’m tired of writing this review and watching this painfully bad lie that like only 4 people care about anyway.

If someone wants to pick up where I left off. (52:09)

Feel free.

I’m not even proof reading this.

Edit: (I did proof read this 4 years later because someone commented hehe.)