No Such Thing as Over Population

As prosperity expands birthrate declines. End of discussion.

TLDR: Worrying about populations anywhere in the low billions is silly. And that’s just one planet.

Malthus was wrong objectively and qualitatively.

The food supply will increase exponentially over time along with everything else subject to the leveraging of computing power, which food is thanks to genetic engineering, robots, and fission.

Consumption of food is the hilariously inefficient process of swapping molecules to export entropy. To get some idea just how efficient, imagine if you could eat uranium for fuel. The idea that the only way to accomplish powering a human permitted by the laws of physics is a 1900s concept of farming is hilariously wrong. The myth of overpopulation is nothing but cover for the pathological greed of the 0.1% ownership caste.

But even assuming no changes to people themselves, it’s still not even that big of a problem the moment we grow a spine, or find ourselves choiceless. Trigger one good sized volcano somewhere and the volcanic winter will counter the runaway methane reaction. (CO2 is a wimp.) It may not perfectly balance but we can make a pretty safe calculation about which we’d prefer. 

Or we could literally do the Matrix revolutions approach minus the permanent nano magic and create our own particulate winter on the installment plan. And that’s just one class of responses available the moment humanity decides to geoengineer willfully, as opposed to incidentally.

Humanity only needs to deploy three (or four depending on definitions) tools to turn this planet into a fully people serving ecosystem. Fission, Software, and Robotics/GE. Fission to power it, software to guide it, and Robotics/GE to actualize it.


Assuming vertical (up or down) deployment of support infrastructure and total planetary urban cover we can see already what the interpersonal density would be: The low birth rate low poverty areas of urban Japan. Since XKCD and others already did the napkin math on how much space there actually is, we could extrapolate to arrive at a maximum prosperous human population for earth. 5 Trillion. With a T.


Area of Earth divided by the area of Texas times Earth’s population at the time of the calculation. So, 200 million square miles for earth’s surface area divided by 268,600 square miles for Texas.

Now, the population density of NYC, (because NYC and Texas were the base of the XKCD math) 28491 people per square mile.

So, 28491 people per square mile covering 200 million square miles leads to a population of 5 trillion 698 billion 200 million. And these are numbers generated without the downward pressure on birth rate caused by property. The final homeostatic number will likely be substantially lower.

“Over population” is a fictional problem. At the very least it’s the very least of our most pressing issues.

Citations and alternate numbers.

http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=51292

POP101: A primer on the future of planet Earth

Oh yeah and all this is assuming population rise isn’t already reversing. But it is. 

My Most Mind Numbing Ban

I just had to share this. I rarely get such blatant evidence. Ok so there is this subreddit called r/LateStageCapitalism right and it’s very much convinced of its own enlightenment. And not without reason since capitalism is at the center of a huge percentage of human policy problems on earth today. 

But of course being run by humans, it is quite irrational. And ironically I was banned for lamenting this easily provable fact.

I am no exception. My irrationality lies in my perpetual (apparently) belief in the power of facts and logic. Like some flabbergasted leftist confused by Trump’s success via the usage of completely transparent lies, I keep expecting proof to matter. But it simply does not in the human policy arena. It only matters in the technical fields where physics actually dominate.

Which is why I sent them another message 15 hours later.

The reply I received is such a glorious encapsulation. I am honestly still processing it. I have trouble even putting the event into words. But I think you’ll see the implications pretty much immediately.

As they say, I have lost my ability to even.

http://underlore.com/avoid-my-mistakes/