Analog Speech Synthesis

YouTube – Creepy video of talking robot mouth.

This triggers some fear/disgust reaction in me and I don’t understand it. To try and convey the feeling I’m having imagine if that was like a throat and mouth cut out of a corpse, but that alone doesn’t explain it.

Perhaps it’s that plus the sound. Sounds have always impacted me more emotionally than visuals have.

Anyway, this is great area of study, it would be awesome to develop an instrument that sings since the first instrument was the human voice anyway. Would be a neat loop.

It’s like “I can’t sing but I built something that can.”

Slaying the Wanderer: Who Murdered Pluto?

Every time I think about the decision to remove Pluto’s designation as a planet my blood begins to boil (at earth normal pressure and temperature.)

There are two things most little boys find interesting at some point, if they are not starving to death or in some other way being neglected or abused, dinosaurs and space.

My solar system had 9 planets. NINE! Not 8.

I don’t care if discoveries showed the Pluto was a ford pinto, if it’s still in the same spot and it’s what we’ve been calling Pluto this whole time then it’s Pluto.

Is it or is it not one of the original wanderers?

In fact has ANYTHING change about Pluto? No. It’s virtually same same way it was before humans.

Inspired by this absurdity I have an idea! I think we should rename all the planets to numbers and we should remove the word “planet” from the scientific vocabulary.

Why? Well, obviously Mars isn’t really a god a war. Just like Pluto isn’t really a planet. We should name it accordingly. If calling Pluto a planet is inaccurate and thus demanding of change then calling Mars a god a war surly is equally inaccurate. It should be renamed Sol 4 or something equally sterile.

And don’t give me that crap about having to add tons of planets if Pluto counts as one. Pluto should merit an exception. Or you could tailor other definitions to suit. Or you could just deal with it as a quirk of an old system, which we do constantly with regard to things like measurements and the calendar.

This is all absurd of course, but then again so was dicking around with Pluto’s classification.

Screw you IAU, pretentious crap like this is why the rank and file think space exploration is a waste of money.

For a MUCH better elaboration on the problem here check this out.

Concealed Deadly Weapons

As some of my readers and all of my friends know I’m a big fan of firearms. Sadly I only own a couple, they are expensive. I generally think of hand weapons as religious artifacts almost, signifying the triumph of human ingenuity over generations of predators. Icons of ability and responsibility. The step away from brawn towards brains. A physical reminder of the first technology. A talisman of our inclination and ability to change the world. From the samurai’s sword, to the gentleman’s rapier, to the minuteman’s musket, to the cowboy’s revolver, to the black panther’s rifle; personal weapons mean a good deal more than simply the ability to kill.

Most of the time all I carry is a knife. (Spyderco Endura 4 Wave, before that it was a Spyderco Spyderfly) I think of it as a human talon. It’s design means I can deploy it nearly as fast as I could deploy a fist. This makes it feel like a part of me, like not so much a device, as a modification to myself.

I feel like most people hate me but in my heart I am flattered that society trusts me literally with the lives of everyone around me. Trust is important to me. People I consider true friends are given keys to my home. I suppose this is a sort of personal ritual as well.

With that de facto authority over the lives of those around me comes the obligation to make good that trust. As such I feel it is my duty to be aware of my surroundings with an eye toward accomplishing goals for the group that an unarmed person may not.

The most obvious hypothetical would be stopping a dangerous person, someone like a terrorist. But any rational measure shows that the likely hood of that happening is effectively nil. The real help I provide is inserting doubt into the minds of muggers and the like. My presence in a crowd increases the chances that any given victim will be armed. This makes the crowd safer from opportunistic parasites.

All this is well understood and the effect on crime is documented, only the irrational dispute the numbers. But, it got me thinking. Perhaps a similar consequence of the transhuman movement is likely to occur. Weapons aren’t always artifacts. I suspect crime is equally affected by the known potential presence of any weapon, any threat to the would be mugger. Martial arts for example.

What’s going to happen to the crime rate when people can download Kung Fu as easily as Neo did or better yet when people can alter their build?

In short order its going to be like living on a planet full of aliens. Starting a fight could be suicidal, for all you know the person you’re about to punch has poisonous spines just under the skin. I think this is going to be a good thing. But of course The Company is going to want to regulate this, make sure everyone stays helpless. Fortunately its not going to be that simple.

For one we’ll have to rethink prison. Suddenly the idea of caging people will be infeasible for the same reason keeping all the animals in the zoo in the same room is infeasible. For two I don’t think people will be willing to allow the government to alter their genome on a whim in the same way we allow them to deprive us of our items. Taking my knife is different than taking my fists. For three trying to police the upgrades will be like trying to police mp3s. All the raw materials are readily available the only exotic component is the information.

I look forward to the day when antler bashing rituals fade into our past. Personal lethality is one way to speed it along.

Boy builds Robot from old TVs

The comments of this video are interesting to me for a variety of reasons.

Some express doubts about the video’s authenticity.

Even if it is a lie, why try to expose it?

Is showing yourself to be clever really worth ruining an attempt to improve the lives of children?

What part of a robot could not be found inside an old TV? The only thing I could think of is the actuators and related stuff. Granted, TV’s don’t have a lot of moving parts, but everything else does.

Others are just trolling, which is a strange thing in and of itself. It’s like the worst thing you can say in this society is a slur.

What’s funny about that to me is far worse things are said as serious and accepted.

Slurs in this context are almost cute by comparison.

In any case, this is a great video, and a great goal. This whole continent is full of people for who the concept of hard work is a foregone conclusion. Getting them into the information processing game could render their natural resources chump change by comparison nearly overnight.

All innovation is simply the recombination of old ideas, this young man has shown that something similar can be done at the physical level. He’s reordering parts we ignorantly consider refuse into a useful form and he’s just one person doing it by hand.

I see tremendous potential here. I think it would be wonderful and ironic if the continent that was so brutally savaged over want of slave labor gave birth to the next humanoid robotic revolution and did it with our leftover on their way to the economic top.

Fantasy maybe, but it would be awesome.

The Myth of Romantic Pr0n

I was reading The Damnation Game by Clive Barker and in it there’s a charcter who is obsessed with porn and in listing his collection Clive mentions “romantic” porn.

Curious if such a thing existed I Googled it briefly. As you might expect all I found was normal porn and gay porn labeled “porn for women.” But it got me thinking about why such a thing doesn’t exist, and if not why not?

It’s a hugely complicated issue when I spent a moment on it. Basically it has to do with the real purpose of why society openly tolerates porn in it’s current form now. Porn’s real function is not to satisfy sexual appetite but to exacerbate and shape it.

Porn always has a lot missing. And before you say “well yeah that’s because it’s porn” I say well still there’s a gap that logically should be jumped. In romantic comedies and mainstream movies romance always comes with trials. The men always have to earn the sex (and more importantly the approval and affection) in some way. But humans like the idea of getting something for nothing. There should be media to cater to that fantasy, that reward of affection and approval without saying why, or saying why in some vague and universally applicable way, for example just because the lead is male, which is what some fundamentalist types are often after. A culture where they are accepted by default for being born the way they are, as males.

Seduction for its own sake while tremendously common among actual men and women would also be a theme that should be common if porn was actually about fulfilling a need and not making it worse. Contrary to what the TV would tell you, women do occasionally seduce men for what amounts to altruistic purposes. Women also positively respond to direct questions and requests in this context from time to time, but again that never makes the boob tube because the point of romantic comedies and TV relationships in general is to train men to be obedient workers and to train women to be compliant (to the will of the TV) hall monitors and prison trustees.

The gap is between the earning of the romantic comedy and the sloppy unsatisfying reward of pornography. We all know that sex is the implied reward of fulfilling the masculine end of the gender spectrum’s social contract, but there is more, a romantic, emotional element that has been suppressed along with the rest of the male emotional spectrum. Indeed among a man’s assets when listed in an attempt to display his worth is often explicitly stated in relation to the sex appeal of his wife. “He had a beautiful wife and loving children” or the like.

There should exist in media the reward segment that falls between these positions. Or depictions of the kind of conquests real men and boy fantasize about, even attempt, but rarely if ever accomplish. For me it would be very direct, new girl shows up, events conspire to produce time alone, conversation happens and they go from there, but in the missing media it would be idealized. Love/lust at first sight, only with a normal looking human.

The dialog would ideally be crafted to cater to insecure men. Twisting the situation and the female’s responses such that common “mistakes” become advantages. Failure morphed into success.

Instant girlfriend, not just sloppy sex with cookie cutter script and ugly french fingernails. And don’t talk to me about soft core porn because that’s just models or over the top crappy “skinemax” type movies.

There are things that come close of course. Red shoe diaries, a small (official?) part of the Emmanuelle series, the Story of O, Secretary and some hentai. Also in my opinion, Dream On, and in some ways, Californication. But I’m thinking romantic porn should be a full fledged subtype. And these examples always struggle to justify the acceptance, or to gloss over its absence with some sort of distraction. Story of O for instance we’re never told really why O has such fanatical devotion for her man but he’s depicted as handsome and painfully rich and if that’s not distracting enough we have the entire BDSM element to shock us away from thinking about it.

A video simulation of all the positive aspects of having a girlfriend should be a sizable market. A video that makes lonely guys feel not just indulged, but wanted, successful, as people. Depictions of worlds where they are fulfilled and enjoyed, worlds where the guy not capable of being the hero, ugly or not, nerd or solidergod, “finds someone”.

If nothing else it surprises me that there aren’t male chauvinist themed porno films. Like, over the top 1950s good house keeping meets Jenna Jamison. Now I don’t mean the 5 seconds of back story on some porn movies, I mean like selling a whole world to the viewer populated with fantasies. Just look at how everyone is reacting to Madmen. You can’t tell me that’s not 90% attributable to a depiction of a world full of sexy ladies content to be “the little woman”.

I think the reason romantic porn of these types, media that fills the gap, doesn’t exist is precisely because it could exist so easily. I think that gap is there so that men are induced to seek it in real life “no matter the cost” as per their television and sexual stereotype instructions. Given some men’s reaction to sex dolls and hentai, I think it’s clear that an extensive romantic porno collection could provide some men with everything they need, perhaps a substantially larger portion of men then the current social picture of a artificially satisfied man, the loner pervo image, would suggest, or is comfortable with. In much the same way that a good horror movie collection plus video games is more than adequate to the task of satisfying our more violent impulses.

There is also the fact that porn of this type would require actresses capable of selling the impression that they strongly like the lead male without having any idea why. Seeing that done without having some excuse to “justify” that emotion could seriously damage some people’s world view.

Showing an actress perfectly mimicking how your girlfriend or wife actually treats you when you’re home alone and happy could make you a little paranoid. And in a society with an economy based on monogamy and sexy female approval/permission as the end all be all achievement, that could cause some SERIOUS problems.

I think that’s exactly what they don’t want. And the rest of my blog explains why.