Update:
I need to point out that there is a cultist, intersectionalist, identity politics, problem in this country. The kind that nods or stay silent when some black supremacists says that all whites should be gassed or some lunatic feminist says all males should be raped etc.
Those people get called SJW too, and I agree they need a pejorative label.
SJW kind of fits because their delusion does indeed take the flavor and form of social justice but the whole argument with them is that they aren’t being just at all. As I said in a comment, even the RWNJ thinks they are fighting for social justice, merely their own brand of it.
In that sense “SJW” is meaningless and absurd and it is in that sense which I attack the use of the label below.
I literally know of no competing term. It’s hard to distill the “actual” cultist SJW thing into a single term. I hesitate to even call them intersectionalists because of course that too can be used for good.
It is undeniably a useful way to parse social realities, but only if used with logical rigor and solid ethical axioms. Sadly it often, perhaps primarily, is not, and I don’t know what to call those people as a group other than SJWs in such a way that my meaning is clear.
Basically SJWs of that stripe are like neoliberals in that they are actually are oppressive forces in the guise of ethical reformers.
The search for a superior term continues. Now it may be intellectually lazy to refuse to consider specific grievances (Such as leftist sexism or racism case by case) but at the same time it is indeed practical to seek a set term for a set phenomena. Below, I call them psychotic politically correct zealots, but that also is more arrow than label. It points in their general direction, but doesn’t actually define them. After all, many aren’t politically correct, many aren’t psychotic, many aren’t zealots, etc, but you still presumably know the group I’m talking about. I can share many words that apply to many of the them, like hypocrite for example, but that doesn’t define them either.
However, my disdain for the term and critique of it below stands because regardless of the problems mentioned above, the core reason the 1% cultivates the term among it’s rube right wing minions is to undermine any dissent which threatens them. The term absolutely exists to enslave. Even if the targets of the term often are worthy of contempt ironically for serving those very same divide and conquer enslavement interests.
Original post:
It’s funny when the Internet tough kids call me or someone else an “SJW” like it’s a bad thing.
Yeah, because fighting for justice in society is something to be mocked, right?
No wonder they own us so thoroughly, and the planet hates Americans so fervently. You morons actually overtly attack the very concept of dissent in the name of justice to the point that it’s now a net-wide meme.
Nothing like the miracle of teen pregnancy to turn out a whole generation of enthusiastic sadistic slaves. These chumps think they are the subversive ones, but they literally couldn’t be more wrong.
Fighting the ultra rich and powerful and their pawns, which real SJWs do every day, takes way more spine than harassing some random marginalized deviant minority from the safety of your TOR/VPN.
They want you oblivious and blind and mean and programmable.
So yeah, I’m an SJW. And if you think that makes me weak? Which one of us writes hate mail to congress and puts our subversive opinion on the internet with our real face and name?
You spineless little wretches wouldn’t last 30 seconds as a real SJW. The instant you saw cops lining up in riot gear in front of you, you’d brown your trousers and scream “I surrender” till your throat bled.
You people should also note that the people most in love with hating “SJWs” on the Internet are the overtly racist, sexist, sadistic, pampered, right wing, white trash, yuppie larvae, 1% lick-spittle sycophants, on 4chan’s /b/.
Being proud of being one of them is literally worse than putting your kid in a KKK uniform because it no doubt occasionally includes putting your kid in a KKK uniform.
If you have a problem with a particular line of argument, be specific. Don’t be so intellectually lazy as to lump all psychotic “Politically Correct” zealots in with social reformers of every stripe.
Pretty damn sure the EFF, the Innocence Project, Mayday Pac, Doctors Without Borders, the ACLU and on and on are literally social justice warriors.
These are the same assholes that like to use the word “butthurt” in defense of corporations or the government.
The PR industry invented you pricks:
Update: 2016-02-22 0221 PM
I’m talking here about all these defective hateful /b/tard neocons trying to act like they’re tough for being social cowards and how no one’s buying it except they themselves.
The entire world recognizes how callow and weak they all are. That’s the whole reason they say “SJW” as if it’s an insult. Because they’re too frail and impotent and dim to attack hard targets like the established elites. They have to go for the marginalized, because they don’t have a chance vs anyone else.
They’re rats attacking the wounded. It takes a thousand of them to equal a single real opponent. That’s also why virtually no one talks back to them.
Firstly, everyone knows it’s pointless. Attempting to enlighten them would be about as successful as trying to teach physics to a roach.
Secondly, being the weakest of the weak, they’re individually not worth anyone’s effort.
The only reason I talk to them is because I recycle the content for essays aimed at the entire species. That’s the only way these GIFT examples are even worth my time.
It’s the same reason 4chans /b/tard crowd has degenerated from the once great Anonymous, into racist psychopaths, that are so lazy they’ve even abbreviated refusing to help people down into an acronym. “NYPA.”
These defectives always hammer out an instant NYPA for the same reason they don’t vote, because jaded cowardice, impotence, and insecurity. It’s always racist trolling and NYPA claims as a smoke screen instead.
They whine about content and SJWs, because they are too inexperienced to remember that fighting for social justice was 90% of anon’s point and that fighting the good fight was the source of all the best threads.
The content now sucks because they’re all spineless cowardly racist neocon degenerates. As in they have literally degenerated. Of course the content is awful.
All the real Anons jumped ship for the dark net or specific activist groups. (Like EFF.) So of course the only thing left is trolls too scared to even consider anything more aggressive to authority than a thank you letter. They keep licking boot and pretending anyone fails to see them as anything other than the spineless wretches that they are.
They literally don’t even know who the real enemy is.
Is it any wonder that Trump is their god?
I see the types that defend (or trivialize) abuse and generally take an Internet tough guy attitude, as a collective organism. Like slime mold or a staph infection.
If you dismiss the suffering of others to any degree, you’re who I’m talking to.
We made it out of the primordial ooze all the way through the ice age by working together more often than being psychopathic parasites to any degree.
The first step to being human is caring about the suffering of others. Ignoring the suffering of others because solving the problem is difficult or complicated is weakness.
That’s the whole reason we honor soldiers and strength in the first place. SELF sacrifice. Not the sacrifice of others. Murder is disturbingly easy.
That’s the irony here. These people trying to sound tough by making excuses for abuse and disregard, are actually shockingly frail in the most qualitative sense.
They are all like Alfrid Lickspittle. Tough talking and dismissive but ultimately extremely dim, totally owned (either by people or pathology), and made out of jello.
