Andrew Yang Will Lose

Update 2019-09-07 1209 AM: They are using blatant media rigging imo as cover for the eventual machine hack. So that when they return a narrow victory for whatever establishment candidate, we’ll blame ourselves, or the media, and not actual cheating. Thus securing both their legitimacy and the legitimacy of rigged elections.

Exit poll discrepancy is how the state department detects rigging in other countries, so why don’t we even have it here?

Update: See also. The california primary is purposefully broken.

Update: See also. The purpose of the DNC is controlled opposition.

Update: I consider this evidence. They used machines to rig the debate against him.

Why do I say he’ll lose? Because hacking. Rigging.

“We’re reacting to it in one of the worst ways possible we’re reacting to it by pretending it’s not happening.” Yang said in a recent town hall with Lessig.

Pretending it’s not happening eh? Like silence on the fact that the machines are rigged and have been rigged since Bush/Gore? (HBO Hacking Democracy/#ExitpollGate) Silence on the fact that the DNC argued in court that it’s perfectly legal to rig a primary because they are a private corporation, and the court agreed? (#DNCFraudLawsuit) Silence on the fact that the Podesta emails prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the 2016 primary was indeed rigged accordingly? (#PodestaEmails)

My comment on that video…

I’ll still go through the motions. I’ll still vote, I’ll still put up the yard sign, etc. But I have no hope of him winning. None. Zero. Unless someone can tell me something new.

Bush v Gore, Ron Paul, Tim Canova v DWS, Bernie Sanders v Podesta.

Blackbox voting, exit poll discrepancies, insecure voting machines, courts agreeing it’s perfectly legal for a party to rig its own primary.

Leaked emails, and insider books, make it clear that happened in 2016.

No substantive audit of vote machine security, Ever, as far as I know has happened, and certainly not since 2016.

Over and above all the problems people talk about with election integrity, such as gerrymandering, voter suppression, media bias and corruption, etc, we have also had since 2016 a deafening silence on the rigged game side of things.

Despite the popularity of blaming Russia for everything bad, there’s still silence because no one is for example using Russia to explain exit poll discrepancies. No one is saying we need to harden our voting machines vs Russian agents. No one is saying the Russians infiltrated the DNC to suppress Sanders. In fact no one of consequence is saying anything about any of it as far as I can tell. That’s why I feel like that whole Russia thing is probably bunk because if they were really worried about foreign agent election tampering that’s the first place they’d go.

It’s been a cliche since the 1880s that vote counters are superior to vote casters when it comes to election influence.

Bickering about policy when the machines are wide open and it’s not even illegal to hack them, is like a 6 inch thick vault door on a child’s nylon bed tent. Indeed it’s even worse than that because at least with the tent it would be obvious if someone cut a hole in the side to bypass the door.

Our voting machines on the other hand being black boxes with no substantive logging or security or even legal protection, would show no direct evidence of tampering.

This is not “conspiracy theory.” It’s simply a combination of documented facts that paint a grim picture for any insurgent popular disruptive candidate. (Sound like anyone we know?)

Silence on this can’t be the response. It didn’t help Gore, it didn’t help Paul, it didn’t help any of our causes.

So this is me calling it. Yang will lose. But not for any of the reasons they will tell you. I’m calling it now so that when people are exploring the aftermath, hopefully they’ll find this or something like it and respond finally to the real problem.